[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180711112659.366ec453@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:26:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use
SRCU
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:17:51 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> I just read the comment that goes with that function; the order doesn't
> matter. All we want to ensure is that the unregistration is visible to
> either sched or srcu tracepoint users.
Yeah, but I think it is still good to change the order. It doesn't
hurt, and in my opinion makes the code a bit more robust.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists