[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <395785739.4156.1531327604723.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use
SRCU
----- On Jul 11, 2018, at 11:26 AM, rostedt rostedt@...dmis.org wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:17:51 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>> I just read the comment that goes with that function; the order doesn't
>> matter. All we want to ensure is that the unregistration is visible to
>> either sched or srcu tracepoint users.
>
> Yeah, but I think it is still good to change the order. It doesn't
> hurt, and in my opinion makes the code a bit more robust.
I don't mind. It makes the code more regular. It does not change
anything wrt robustness here though.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists