[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712143057.49bfcab5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:30:57 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi-mkp tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:17:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18:0,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:82,
> from drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:61:
> drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c: In function 'fc_rport_recv_req':
> include/linux/lockdep.h:347:45: warning: 'rdata' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
> ^
> drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:1832:24: note: 'rdata' was declared here
> struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
> ^~~~~
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> ee35624e1e4e ("scsi: libfc: Add lockdep annotations")
>
> It is actually complaining about function fc_rport_recv_plogi_req()
> (presumably it is being inlined) and this looks like an actual bug :-(
This warning now appears after the merge of the scsi tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists