linux-kernel - [PATCH v4] cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1531375675-52623-1-git-send-email-george.cherian@cavium.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:07:55 -0700
From:   George Cherian <george.cherian@...ium.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        pprakash@...eaurora.org, George Cherian <george.cherian@...ium.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur_freq support for CPPC

Per Section 8.4.7.1.3 of ACPI 6.2, The platform provides performance
feedback via set of performance counters. To determine the actual
performance level delivered over time, OSPM may read a set of
performance counters from the Reference Performance Counter Register
and the Delivered Performance Counter Register.

OSPM calculates the delivered performance over a given time period by
taking a beginning and ending snapshot of both the reference and
delivered performance counters, and calculating:

delivered_perf = reference_perf X (delta of delivered_perf counter / delta of reference_perf counter).

Implement the above and hook this to the cpufreq->get method.

Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@...ium.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index a9d3eec..30f3021 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -296,10 +296,62 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline u64 get_delta(u64 t1, u64 t0)
+{
+	if (t1 > t0 || t0 > ~(u32)0)
+		return t1 - t0;
+
+	return (u32)t1 - (u32)t0;
+}
+
+static int cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
+				     struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0,
+				     struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t1)
+{
+	u64 delta_reference, delta_delivered;
+	u64 reference_perf, delivered_perf;
+
+	reference_perf = fb_ctrs_t0.reference_perf;
+
+	delta_reference = get_delta(fb_ctrs_t1.reference,
+				    fb_ctrs_t0.reference);
+	delta_delivered = get_delta(fb_ctrs_t1.delivered,
+				    fb_ctrs_t0.delivered);
+
+	/* Check to avoid divide-by zero */
+	if (delta_reference || delta_delivered)
+		delivered_perf = (reference_perf * delta_delivered) /
+					delta_reference;
+	else
+		delivered_perf = cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf;
+
+	return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, delivered_perf);
+}
+
+static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum)
+{
+	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0};
+	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, &fb_ctrs_t0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */
+
+	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, &fb_ctrs_t1);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0, fb_ctrs_t1);
+}
+
 static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
 	.verify = cppc_verify_policy,
 	.target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target,
+	.get = cppc_cpufreq_get_rate,
 	.init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.stop_cpu = cppc_cpufreq_stop_cpu,
 	.name = "cppc_cpufreq",
-- 
1.8.3.1