linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] console: Replace #if 1 with a bool to ignore WARN_CONSOLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180712080920.GA17915@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:09:20 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console: Replace #if 1 with a bool to ignore
 WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED()

On (07/12/18 09:53), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> > True, but at the same time nobody complained that we didn't have those
> > extra WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED()-s. Just saying. Over all I agree that there
> > is probably some value in those extra WARN-s.
> 
> I agree that there is some value in the extra WARN's. Also it seems
> that it is useful to disable them for debugging purposes. I do not
> see a better solution. Therefore I am fine with this one.

Good.

> Yes, this extra comment would be appreciated.

Yep.

> If you send v2, please, break also the WARN definition to 80-chars's
> per line ;-)

Yeah, I noticed that too.

Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

	-ss