[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712121146.GS2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:11:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/memory-model: Add extra ordering for locks and
remove it for ordinary release/acquire
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:01:00PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > OTOH (as I pointed out earlier) the strengthening we're configuring
> > will prevent some arch. (riscv being just the example of today!) to
> > go "full RCsc", and this will inevitably "complicate" both the LKMM
>
> "full RCpc"
That's a good thing :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists