lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712124326.GA19272@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:43:26 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/42] drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(): fix open-coded
 filp_clone_open()

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 05:15:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> Actually, looking at the entire thing, I'm rather tempted to go for
> 	alloc_empty_file(f_flags, cred)
> setting both f_flags and f_flags-derived part of f_mode, making
> 	alloc_file_pseudo(inode, mnt, name, f_flags, ops)
> 	alloc_file_clone(base, f_flags, ops)
> do the same automatically as they call alloc_empty_file().

See vfs.git#work.open3; one commit added just before "pass creds
to get_empty_filp(), make sure dentry_open() passes the right creds",
one just after.

The first one ("alloc_file(): switch to passing O_... flags instead of
 FMODE_... mode") pulls ->f_flags assignments into preceding alloc_file(),
the second ("pass ->f_flags value to alloc_empty_file()") makes
alloc_empty_file() set ->f_flags and ->f_flags-derived part of ->f_mode,
with do_dentry_open() leaving these parts of ->f_mode alone.

The rest is pretty much identical to the previous iteration of the
series, except that alloc_file wrappers inherit the switch to passing
O_...

A question regarding the customs in such situations - are previous
Reviewed-by/Acked-by normally kept across rebases like that?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ