[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712015848.GA663@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:58:48 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console: Replace #if 1 with a bool to ignore
WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED()
On (07/11/18 15:17), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +bool ignore_console_lock_warning __read_mostly;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ignore_console_lock_warning);
OK. So, to recap,
We made is_console_locked() EXPORT_SYMBOL recently [it's still in linux-next],
so people could use WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED in more places; this made other
people unhappy, so now we add another EXPORT_SYMBOL to the picture, which will
disable those newly added WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED and make other people happy
again.
This makes me wonder - do we want to add more WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED in the
first place? :)
Other than that, the patch looks OK to me I guess. I'm not super happy with
more printk EXPORT_SYMBOL-s, frankly speaking, I'm not entirely in love with
the "add a bool flag to suppress warn print outs which we added in the
previous patch" direction, but if you guys want/need it...
Probably I'm just dramatizing it, as usual ;)
The removal of "#if 1" is definitely nice.
Let's hear from Petr.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists