[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1531408170-45758-2-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:09:26 +0800
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>, <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
<yunlong.song@...oud.com>, <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
CC: <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
<shengyong1@...wei.com>, <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do not set free of current section
For the case when sbi->segs_per_sec > 1, take section:segment = 5 for
example, if segment 1 is just used and allocate new segment 2, and the
blocks of segment 1 is invalidated, at this time, the previous code will
use __set_test_and_free to free the free_secmap and free_sections++,
this is not correct since it is still a current section, so fix it.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index b5bd328..5049551 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ static inline void __set_test_and_free(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, free_i->free_segmap)) {
free_i->free_segments++;
+ if (IS_CURSEC(sbi, secno))
+ goto skip_free;
next = find_next_bit(free_i->free_segmap,
start_segno + sbi->segs_per_sec, start_segno);
if (next >= start_segno + sbi->segs_per_sec) {
@@ -455,6 +457,7 @@ static inline void __set_test_and_free(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
free_i->free_sections++;
}
}
+skip_free:
spin_unlock(&free_i->segmap_lock);
}
--
1.8.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists