[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AtrR52+U1XrJbeD6WnuVmsYMESYwq643uFvRE2avJxNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:18:14 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Yongcai Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: pfuze100: add support to en-/disable
switch regulators
Hi Marco,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Add enable/disable support for switch regulators on pfuze100.
>
> Based on commit 5fe156f1cab4 ("regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for
> switch") which is reverted due to boot regressions by commit 464a5686e6c9
> ("regulator: Revert "regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for switch"").
> Disabling the switch regulators will only be done if the user specifies
> "pfuze-disable-sw" in its device tree to keep backward compatibility with
> current dtb's [1]. Otherwise the regulators are marked as 'disabled', but
> the driver keeps them on. So it's more like a simulated disable.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10490381/
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists