[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712163916.pzewd3nhane7af3u@kshutemo-mobl1>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:39:16 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: Fix vma_is_anonymous() false-positives
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 06:20:39PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Kirill, I am not trying to review this change (but it looks good to me),
> just a silly question...
>
> On 07/12, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >
> > This can be fixed by assigning anonymous VMAs own vm_ops and not relying
> > on it being NULL.
>
> I agree, this makes sense, but...
>
> > If ->mmap() failed to set ->vm_ops, mmap_region() will set it to
> > dummy_vm_ops.
>
> Shouldn't this change alone fix the problem?
Unfortunately, no. I've tried it before. Mapping /dev/zero with
MAP_PRIVATE hast to produce anonymous VMA. The trick with dummy_vm_ops
wouldn't be able to handle the situation.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists