[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41770e0f-c0ab-5fb7-6c8f-6cf4f80f01f0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:10:29 -0700
From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, joe@...ches.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, james.feist@...ux.intel.com,
vernon.mauery@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Add newline characters into message
printings.
On 7/12/2018 1:38 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:10 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 09:53 -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
>>> On 7/10/2018 10:42 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> There are some log printing without a newline character. This
>>>>> patch adds the missing newline characters.
>> []
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
>> []
>>>>> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static bool aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus)
>>>>> */
>>>>> if (bus->master_state == ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_START) {
>>>>> if (unlikely(!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK))) {
>>>>> - pr_devel("no slave present at %02x", msg->addr);
>>>>> + pr_devel("no slave present at %02x\n", msg->addr);
>>>>
>>>> Unless something changed in the last couple versions of the kernel, this is the
>>>> only line that actually changes anything. dev_* inserts a newline for every
>>>> call.
>>
>> Not true.
>>
>> Any printk without KERN_CONT inserts a newline
>> if the last character
>> emitted is not a newline.
>>
>> dev_<level> uses can also be followed by pr_cont.
>>
>> So this patch does reduce the possibility of
>> interleaved messages from multiple processes.
>
> My mistake. Thanks for pointing that out.
>
> Jae, forget what I said earlier. This looks good to me.
>
Okay. I'll keep this patch as is.
Thanks Joe for your clarification!
Thanks Brendan for your 'Reviewed-by' tag!
Jae
Powered by blists - more mailing lists