lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712171724.GR3008@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:17:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/nouveau: Remove bogus crtc check in
 pmops_runtime_idle

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:02:54PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This both uses the legacy modesetting structures in a racy manner, and
> additionally also doesn't even check the right variable (enabled != the
> CRTC is actually turned on for atomic).
> 
> This fixes issues on my P50 regarding the dedicated GPU not entering
> runtime suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org

On both patch 2&3:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

->enable vs. ->active is probably the biggest source of pain in atomic,
and beyond typing even more kerneldoc that will be ignored (there's
another series doing exactly that on the list) I have no idea what to do.
90% rule is to look at ->enable in atomic_check code (since DPMS changes
should always work) and ->active in atomic_commit code.

Wrt the legacy state: For the legacy pointers we can set them to NULL for
atomic, and Ville has done that. That's real effective at stopping drivers
from looking at the wrong thing. But for the others like this one here I
dunno what to do to effectively hide them from atomic drivers.

</rant>

Cheers, Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> index 0f668e275ee1..c7ec86d6c3c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> @@ -881,22 +881,11 @@ nouveau_pmops_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  static int
>  nouveau_pmops_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -	struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(drm_dev);
> -	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> -
>  	if (!nouveau_pmops_runtime()) {
>  		pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(crtc, &drm->dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
> -		if (crtc->enabled) {
> -			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failing to power off - crtc active\n");
> -			return -EBUSY;
> -		}
> -	}
>  	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
>  	pm_runtime_autosuspend(dev);
>  	/* we don't want the main rpm_idle to call suspend - we want to autosuspend */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ