[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712191753.fvk2qersdvhcoqzp@linux-r8p5>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:17:53 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: waitqueue lockdep annotation V3
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>this series adds a strategic lockdep_assert_held to __wake_up_common
>to ensure callers really do hold the wait_queue_head lock when calling
>the unlocked wake_up variants. It turns out epoll did not do this
>for a fairly common path (hit all the time by systemd during bootup),
>so the second patch fixed this instance as well.
I ran into these changes because of patch 1 getting rid of ep->lock. Is
there any reason why this series was never picked up?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists