linux-kernel - Re: [v2,3/3] i2c: at91: added slave mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180712214845.iimw4sfckgm6uhh4@ninjato>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:48:45 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Juergen Fitschen <me@....yt>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2,3/3] i2c: at91: added slave mode support

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:42:57AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:51:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > Sorry for having not catched it. If I remember well, it was the only
> > > issue I had while testing the slave support.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > BTW maybe I asked already and forgot: is this IP core capable of being
> > > > master and slave on the same bus?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > No the master and slave modes are exclusive.
> > 
> > Pity.
> > 
> > But thanks for the heads up, any tag you want to give? Ack or Rev?
> > 
> 
> Yes sure, you can add my Ack. I would be pleased to see the slave
> support taken.

Not needed now, but next time please give a formal ack. Patchwork
collects them for me automatically, this saves me quite some work.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)