[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20099.1531433120@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:05:20 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabinv@...s.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, qat-linux@...el.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] rxrpc: Prepare to remove VLA usage for SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> From what I can tell, neither of the two are called in atomic context, so
> you should be able to use a GFP_KERNEL allocation.
You need to be careful doing that since the allocation might happen in the AFS
writeback path. I use GFP_NOIO or GFP_NOFS in rxkad.c and skb_cow_data() uses
GFP_ATOMIC - though we should have single ownership of the packet at this
point.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists