lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180713050204.GB2379@xz-mi>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:02:04 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...son.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Disable binding to PFs with SR-IOV enabled

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 04:33:04PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> We expect to receive PFs with SR-IOV disabled, however some host
> drivers leave SR-IOV enabled at unbind.  This puts us in a state where
> we can potentially assign both the PF and the VF, leading to both
> functionality as well as security concerns due to lack of managing the
> SR-IOV state as well as vendor dependent isolation from the PF to VF.
> If we were to attempt to actively disable SR-IOV on driver probe, we
> risk VF bound drivers blocking, potentially risking live lock
> scenarios.  Therefore simply refuse to bind to PFs with SR-IOV enabled
> with a warning message indicating the issue.  Users can resolve this
> by re-binding to the host driver and disabling SR-IOV before
> attempting to use the device with vfio-pci.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ