[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B485441.1080305@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:26:57 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, j@...fi, kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hostap: hide unused procfs helpers
+ Randy
On 7/13/2018 9:03 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_hw.c:2901:12: warning: ‘prism2_registers_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int prism2_registers_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_proc.c:16:12: warning: ‘prism2_debug_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int prism2_debug_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> ^
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_proc.c:49:12: warning: ‘prism2_stats_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int prism2_stats_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> ^
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_proc.c:177:12: warning: ‘prism2_crypt_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int prism2_crypt_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> ^
>
> fix this by adding #ifdef around them.
> hfa384x_read_reg is only used by prism2_registers_proc_show,so move it
> into #ifdef.
There was already a fix for this posted by Randy Dunlap taking a
different approach, ie. use __maybe_unused classifier. To be honest I
prefer the ifdef approach as it is more explicit and does not feel like
a cheat.
Actually some of the functions are between a flag already
PRISM2_NO_PROCFS_DEBUG which is in a private header file
hostap_config.h. Seems like this would be better placed in Kconfig and
depend on CONFIG_PROCFS. Anyway, this driver is old cruft. Maybe some
people are still running it, but it is probably not worth the effort so
fine with either fix.
Regards,
Arend
Powered by blists - more mailing lists