[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3NbrRVC-7HW8NiNQw+E3n_-r746AFTc2dftagTYLYDtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:16:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...rochip.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: atmel nand: fix build warning on 64-bit
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Tudor Ambarus
<tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com> wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> On 07/09/2018 06:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> + nc->ebi_csa_offs = (uintptr_t)match->data;
>
> I guess we should declare ebi_csa_offs as size_t, right?
Yes, that would make sense, though it doesn't change the behavior.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists