linux-kernel - Re: [bug] kpti, perf_event, bts: sporadic truncated trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180713105316.GX2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:53:16 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        "Shishkin, Alexander" <alexander.shishkin@...el.com>,
        "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] kpti, perf_event, bts: sporadic truncated trace

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> A little "optimization" crept into alloc_bts_buffer() along the way,
> which now places bts_interrupt_threshold not on a record boundary.
> And Stephane has shown me the sentence in Vol 3B, 17.4.9, which says
> "This address must point to an offset from the BTS buffer base that
> is a multiple of the BTS record size."
> 
> Please give the patch below a try, and let us know if it helps (if it
> does not, then I think we'll need perfier expertise than I can give).

Ooh, good find!

> --- 4.18-rc4/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c	2018-06-03 14:15:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c	2018-07-12 17:38:28.471378616 -0700
> @@ -408,9 +408,11 @@ static int alloc_bts_buffer(int cpu)
>  	ds->bts_buffer_base = (unsigned long) cea;
>  	ds_update_cea(cea, buffer, BTS_BUFFER_SIZE, PAGE_KERNEL);
>  	ds->bts_index = ds->bts_buffer_base;
> -	max = BTS_RECORD_SIZE * (BTS_BUFFER_SIZE / BTS_RECORD_SIZE);
> -	ds->bts_absolute_maximum = ds->bts_buffer_base + max;
> -	ds->bts_interrupt_threshold = ds->bts_absolute_maximum - (max / 16);
> +	max = BTS_BUFFER_SIZE / BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
> +	ds->bts_absolute_maximum = ds->bts_buffer_base +
> +					max * BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
> +	ds->bts_interrupt_threshold = ds->bts_absolute_maximum -
> +					(max / 16) * BTS_RECORD_SIZE;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>