[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180713115010.GA16228@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:50:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
fabio.estevam@....com, Anson.Huang@....com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pfuze100: add optional pfuze-disable-sw
binding
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 18-07-12 16:31, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:02:39PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- pfuze-disable-sw: Disable all unused switch regulators to save power
> > This is a bit of a confused way of specifying things that depends on the
> > Linux implementation, and the property sounds like a double negative
> > too. I'd say something like "pfuze-support-disable" and then explicitly
> > say that this is a workaround for backwards compatibility.
> I can't find the double negative. Anyway your binding sounds better. So
> I will use yours. Should we add a vendor prefix too to be clear? I will
> also add some more informations to mark it as workaround.
The property doesn't disable the use of switch regulators, it enables
their disabling. A vendor prefix is probably required but I can't
entirely follow the DT rules there, it certainly shouldn't hurt anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists