[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180713125624.13783-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:56:24 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: m.purski@...sung.com, p.paillet@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: fix _regulator_do_disable return value
Currently _regulator_do_disable returns 0 if either the ena_pin nor the
ops.disbale() isn't present. This assumes that the call was successful
but it wasn't because disbaling isn't supported at all.
The last case of the if-chain should return -EINVAL, because disabling
isn't supported by the driver as it is done already by
_regulator_do_enable.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index bb1324f93143..69b4e096b632 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2311,6 +2311,8 @@ static int _regulator_do_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
ret = rdev->desc->ops->disable(rdev);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
+ } else {
+ return -EINVAL;
}
/* cares about last_off_jiffy only if off_on_delay is required by
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists