[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfpX7m3zLii3MKbW=S2rkh7O4BVygFdP7aB95jJ8hCBuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:26:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart.Hayes@...l.com, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v4] dell_rbu: make firmware payload memory uncachable
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 7:28 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com> wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
>> This driver has no maintainer.
>
> Stuart,
>
> Outside of this patch, I think it would make sense to send some follow up patch
> series that do the following:
>
> 1) Let you take over as maintainer (Update MAINTAINERS)
> 2) Move this driver to platform-x86
Darren, what do you think about this step?
If we would go this way, first move, then take maintainership to reduce a churn.
> 3) Update dell_rbu.txt with the correct URLs and mention that it's only for enterprise
> hardware. Client hardware has instead opted to support UEFI capsules for updates
> from Linux.
>
> Since it's really a platform feature and specific to only Dell enterprise hardware
> I think it makes sense to move over to an area with subsystem maintainers that
> can help to review patches as needed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists