linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/32] vfs: syscall: Add fsopen() to prepare for superblock creation [ver #9]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrXS9ShF0k_tiFcBN6NY6ODCvhuZLh15VeHC5JUz9gWQuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:14:44 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/32] vfs: syscall: Add fsopen() to prepare for
 superblock creation [ver #9]

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:40 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
>> > Whilst I'm at it, do we want the option of doing the equivalent of
>> > mountat()?  I.e. offering the option to open all the device files used by
>> > a superblock with dfd and AT_* flags in combination with the filename?
>> >
>>
>> Isn't that more or less what I was suggesting?
>
> Yes, you suggested that.  I'm asking if we actually need that.
>

Suppose some program in a container chroots itself and then tries to
create an fscontext backed by "/path/to/blockdev".  The syscall gets
intercepted by a container manager.  That manager now has a somewhat
awkward time of mounting the same fs, although it could use
"/proc/PID/root/path/to/blockdev", I suppose.  Even that approach has
some potentially awkward permission issues.  I would defer to the
people who actually write software like this, but I can imagine fds
being considerably easier to work with.