linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do not set free of current section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a70ce4c-5fad-a550-4fa4-3a09bb76e37f@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:10:32 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <chao@...nel.org>, <yunlong.song@...oud.com>
CC:     <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
        <shengyong1@...wei.com>, <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do not set free of current section

On 2018/7/12 23:09, Yunlong Song wrote:
> For the case when sbi->segs_per_sec > 1, take section:segment = 5 for
> example, if segment 1 is just used and allocate new segment 2, and the
> blocks of segment 1 is invalidated, at this time, the previous code will
> use __set_test_and_free to free the free_secmap and free_sections++,
> this is not correct since it is still a current section, so fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Thanks,