lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2566d6f6-4f3b-e2d8-326e-450372b71b44@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:45:39 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <chao@...nel.org>, <yunlong.song@...oud.com>
CC:     <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
        <shengyong1@...wei.com>, <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: disable small discard in lfs mode

On 2018/7/13 11:39, Yunlong Song wrote:
> How about change test_opt(sbi, LFS) to f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi->sb) in 
> this patch, we apply
> this patch to zoned block device?

IIRC, we will use blkdev_reset_zones instead of __queue_discard_cmd for such
kind of device, so we will not encounter the issue you described.

Thanks,

> 
> On 2018/7/13 11:17, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/7/12 23:09, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>> In lfs mode, it is better to send the discard of the overall section
>>> each time to avoid missing alignment with flash.
>> Hmm.. I think LFS mode can be used widely on different kind of device instead of
>> just on zoned block device, so let's just keep old implementation here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ++-
>>>   fs/f2fs/sysfs.c   | 4 ++++
>>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> index fd38b61..f6c20e0 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> @@ -1766,7 +1766,8 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>   	atomic_set(&dcc->issing_discard, 0);
>>>   	atomic_set(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt, 0);
>>>   	dcc->nr_discards = 0;
>>> -	dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
>>> +	dcc->max_discards = test_opt(sbi, LFS) ? 0 :
>>> +				MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
>>>   	dcc->undiscard_blks = 0;
>>>   	dcc->root = RB_ROOT;
>>>   	dcc->rbtree_check = false;
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> index 2e7e611..4b6c457 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> @@ -271,6 +271,10 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>>>   		return count;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> +	if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "max_small_discards") &&
>>> +		test_opt(sbi, LFS))
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>>   	*ui = t;
>>>   
>>>   	if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "iostat_enable") && *ui == 0)
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ