[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <751491f9b9d7ce18f048ba44fbdb17d8c699e674.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:11:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jtoppins@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Add optional
.get_maintainer.MAINTAINERS override
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 14:51 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:14:28PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 15:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 17:58 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > > We have an internal use case of multiple MAINTAINER files, some folks have
> > > > more rights to patches than others so they are not allowed to be cc'd (think
> > > > embargoed stuff).
> >
> > How about:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> You are probably busy with stuff, but wanted to softly poke you to see what
> is going on with this patch and if there is anything we can help with?
Hey Don. No worries.
Tell me again if the --find-maintainer-files=<path or file> should
be exclusive or should it also read any existing MAINTAINERS file?
What if anything is wrong with what I suggested?
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists