[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw1vrsTjJyoq4Q3jBwv1nXaTkkmSbHO6vozWZuTc7_6Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:00:32 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
"Wangkai (Kevin,C)" <wangkai86@...wei.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] fs/dcache: Track & limit # of negative dentries
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:35 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Could we allocate -ve entries from separate slab?
No, because negative dentrires don't stay negative.
Every single positive dentry starts out as a negative dentry that is
passed in to "lookup()" to maybe be made positive.
And most of the time they <i>do</i> turn positive, because most of the
time people actually open files that exist.
But then occasionally you don't, because you're just blindly opening a
filename whether it exists or not (to _check_ whether it's there).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists