[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKGvQLKV_LmyYaOaF_G6CzF6kUp03cROz1+1PWHEMdrZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:34:19 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] ima: based on policy warn about loading firmware
(pre-allocated buffer)
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Some systems are memory constrained but they need to load very large
> firmwares. The firmware subsystem allows drivers to request this
> firmware be loaded from the filesystem, but this requires that the
> entire firmware be loaded into kernel memory first before it's provided
> to the driver. This can lead to a situation where we map the firmware
> twice, once to load the firmware into kernel memory and once to copy the
> firmware into the final resting place.
>
> To resolve this problem, commit a098ecd2fa7d ("firmware: support loading
> into a pre-allocated buffer") introduced request_firmware_into_buf() API
> that allows drivers to request firmware be loaded directly into a
> pre-allocated buffer.
>
> Do devices using pre-allocated memory run the risk of the firmware being
> accessible to the device prior to the completion of IMA's signature
> verification any more than when using two buffers? (Refer to mailing list
> discussion[1]).
>
> Only on systems with an IOMMU can the access be prevented. As long as
> the signature verification completes prior to the DMA map is performed,
> the device can not access the buffer. This implies that the same buffer
> can not be re-used. Can we ensure the buffer has not been DMA mapped
> before using the pre-allocated buffer?
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/10/56
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
I can't decide if it's worth adding the link (maybe using the
lkml.kernel.org url[1]) directly in the code or not.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAKv+Gu-knHeBRGqo+2pb3X9cCjwovEykoXUf=DZyP7aJpoS60A@mail.gmail.com
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists