[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLkhC8Jb0zVXuVZnbJM6tmMpyGkaoCvw=jACLA3fnoChw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:59:09 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabinv@...s.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, qat-linux@...el.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] treewide: Prepare to remove VLA usage for AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 08:07:10PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On a plane today I started converting all these to shash. IIUC, it
>> just looks like this (apologies for whitespace damage):
>
> Yes if it doesn't actually make use of SGs then shash would be
> the way to go. However, for SG users ahash is the best interface.
Nearly all of them artificially build an sg explicitly to use the
ahash interface. :P
So, I'll take that as a "yes, do these conversions." :) Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists