linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180716190337.26133-7-riel@surriel.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:03:36 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org, efault@....de, kernel-team@...com,
        mingo@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode

Now that CPUs in lazy TLB mode no longer receive TLB shootdown IPIs, except
at page table freeing time, and idle CPUs will no longer get shootdown IPIs
for things like mprotect and madvise, we can always use lazy TLB mode.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 16 ----------------
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               | 15 +--------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 3aa3204b5dc0..511bf5fae8b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -148,22 +148,6 @@ static inline unsigned long build_cr3_noflush(pgd_t *pgd, u16 asid)
 #define __flush_tlb_one_user(addr) __native_flush_tlb_one_user(addr)
 #endif
 
-static inline bool tlb_defer_switch_to_init_mm(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * If we have PCID, then switching to init_mm is reasonably
-	 * fast.  If we don't have PCID, then switching to init_mm is
-	 * quite slow, so we try to defer it in the hopes that we can
-	 * avoid it entirely.  The latter approach runs the risk of
-	 * receiving otherwise unnecessary IPIs.
-	 *
-	 * This choice is just a heuristic.  The tlb code can handle this
-	 * function returning true or false regardless of whether we have
-	 * PCID.
-	 */
-	return !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID);
-}
-
 struct tlb_context {
 	u64 ctx_id;
 	u64 tlb_gen;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index e4156e37aa71..493559cae2d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -379,20 +379,7 @@ void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
 		return;
 
-	if (tlb_defer_switch_to_init_mm()) {
-		/*
-		 * There's a significant optimization that may be possible
-		 * here.  We have accurate enough TLB flush tracking that we
-		 * don't need to maintain coherence of TLB per se when we're
-		 * lazy.  We do, however, need to maintain coherence of
-		 * paging-structure caches.  We could, in principle, leave our
-		 * old mm loaded and only switch to init_mm when
-		 * tlb_remove_page() happens.
-		 */
-		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, true);
-	} else {
-		switch_mm(NULL, &init_mm, NULL);
-	}
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, true);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.14.4