[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1531773650-30424-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 02:10:50 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gkohli@...eaurora.org, cpandya@...eaurora.org,
neeraju@...eaurora.org, Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4] time: Fix extra sleeptime injection when suspend fails
Currently, there exists a corner case assuming when there is
only one clocksource e.g RTC, and system failed to go to
suspend mode. While resume rtc_resume() injects the sleeptime
as timekeeping_rtc_skipresume() returned 'false' (default value
of sleeptime_injected) due to which we can see mismatch in
timestamps.
This issue can also come in a system where more than one
clocksource are present and very first suspend fails.
Fix this by handling the sleeptime_injected flag properly.
Success case:
------------
{sleeptime_injected=false}
rtc_suspend() => timekeeping_suspend() => timekeeping_resume() =>
(sleeptime injected)
rtc_resume()
Failure case:
------------
{failure in sleep path} {sleeptime_injected=false}
rtc_suspend() => rtc_resume()
sleeptime injected again which was not required as the suspend failed)
Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
---
Changes in V4:
* Changes as suggested by John
- Changed the variable name from sleeptime_injected to suspend_timing_needed
- Changed the boolean logic.
Changes in v3:
* Updated commit subject and description.
* Updated the patch as per the fix given by Thomas Gleixner.
Changes in v2:
* Updated the commit text.
* Removed extra variable and used the earlier static
variable 'sleeptime_injected'.
drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +-
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c
index d37588f..ee455cc 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/class.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
struct timespec64 sleep_time;
int err;
- if (timekeeping_rtc_skipresume())
+ if (!timekeeping_rtc_skipresume())
return 0;
rtc_hctosys_ret = -ENODEV;
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 4786df9..b25f771 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1510,8 +1510,20 @@ void __weak read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
ts->tv_nsec = 0;
}
-/* Flag for if timekeeping_resume() has injected sleeptime */
-static bool sleeptime_injected;
+/*
+ * Flag reflecting whether timekeeping_resume() has injected sleeptime.
+ *
+ * The flag starts of false and is only set when a suspend reaches
+ * timekeeping_suspend(), timekeeping_resume() sets it to false when the
+ * timekeeper clocksource is not stopping across suspend and has been
+ * used to update sleep time. If the timekeeper clocksource has stopped
+ * then the flag stays true and is used by the RTC resume code to decide
+ * whether sleeptime must be injected and if so the flag gets false then.
+ *
+ * If a suspend fails before reaching timekeeping_resume() then the flag
+ * stays false and prevents erroneous sleeptime injection.
+ */
+static bool suspend_timing_needed;
/* Flag for if there is a persistent clock on this platform */
static bool persistent_clock_exists;
@@ -1610,7 +1622,7 @@ static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timekeeper *tk,
*/
bool timekeeping_rtc_skipresume(void)
{
- return sleeptime_injected;
+ return suspend_timing_needed;
}
/**
@@ -1646,6 +1658,8 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
+ suspend_timing_needed = false;
+
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
@@ -1671,7 +1685,6 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
struct timespec64 ts_new, ts_delta;
u64 cycle_now;
- sleeptime_injected = false;
read_persistent_clock64(&ts_new);
clockevents_resume();
@@ -1701,13 +1714,13 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
tk->tkr_mono.mask);
nsec = mul_u64_u32_shr(cyc_delta, clock->mult, clock->shift);
ts_delta = ns_to_timespec64(nsec);
- sleeptime_injected = true;
+ suspend_timing_needed = false;
} else if (timespec64_compare(&ts_new, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) {
ts_delta = timespec64_sub(ts_new, timekeeping_suspend_time);
- sleeptime_injected = true;
+ suspend_timing_needed = false;
}
- if (sleeptime_injected)
+ if (!suspend_timing_needed)
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta);
/* Re-base the last cycle value */
@@ -1743,6 +1756,8 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void)
if (timekeeping_suspend_time.tv_sec || timekeeping_suspend_time.tv_nsec)
persistent_clock_exists = true;
+ suspend_timing_needed = true;
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists