[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807162331020.1693@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:32:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ioapic: Do not unmask io_apic when interrupt is in
progress
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > +static inline bool ioapic_prepare_move(struct irq_data *data)
>
> > +static inline void ioapic_finish_move(struct irq_data *data, bool moveit)
>
> > +static inline bool ioapic_move_prepare(struct irq_data *data)
>
> > +static inline void ioapic_move_irq(struct irq_data *data, bool masked)
>
> Verb or noun?
Bah. prepare/finish_move() for both places ....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists