linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.17 43/67] arm64: neon: Fix function may_use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180716073449.988372943@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:35:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Yandong Zhao <yandong77520@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 43/67] arm64: neon: Fix function may_use_simd() return error status

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yandong Zhao <yandong77520@...il.com>

commit 2fd8eb4ad87104c54800ef3cea498c92eb15c78a upstream.

It does not matter if the caller of may_use_simd() migrates to
another cpu after the call, but it is still important that the
kernel_neon_busy percpu instance that is read matches the cpu the
task is running on at the time of the read.

This means that raw_cpu_read() is not sufficient.  kernel_neon_busy
may appear true if the caller migrates during the execution of
raw_cpu_read() and the next task to be scheduled in on the initial
cpu calls kernel_neon_begin().

This patch replaces raw_cpu_read() with this_cpu_read() to protect
against this race.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Fixes: cb84d11e1625 ("arm64: neon: Remove support for nested or hardirq kernel-mode NEON")
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Yandong Zhao <yandong77520@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/simd.h |   19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/simd.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/simd.h
@@ -29,20 +29,15 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, kernel_neon_busy);
 static __must_check inline bool may_use_simd(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The raw_cpu_read() is racy if called with preemption enabled.
-	 * This is not a bug: kernel_neon_busy is only set when
-	 * preemption is disabled, so we cannot migrate to another CPU
-	 * while it is set, nor can we migrate to a CPU where it is set.
-	 * So, if we find it clear on some CPU then we're guaranteed to
-	 * find it clear on any CPU we could migrate to.
-	 *
-	 * If we are in between kernel_neon_begin()...kernel_neon_end(),
-	 * the flag will be set, but preemption is also disabled, so we
-	 * can't migrate to another CPU and spuriously see it become
-	 * false.
+	 * kernel_neon_busy is only set while preemption is disabled,
+	 * and is clear whenever preemption is enabled. Since
+	 * this_cpu_read() is atomic w.r.t. preemption, kernel_neon_busy
+	 * cannot change under our feet -- if it's set we cannot be
+	 * migrated, and if it's clear we cannot be migrated to a CPU
+	 * where it is set.
 	 */
 	return !in_irq() && !irqs_disabled() && !in_nmi() &&
-		!raw_cpu_read(kernel_neon_busy);
+		!this_cpu_read(kernel_neon_busy);
 }
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */