[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180716073450.669892751@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:35:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 47/67] i2c: recovery: if possible send STOP with recovery pulses
4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
commit abe41184abac487264a4904bfcff2d5500dccce6 upstream.
I2C clients may misunderstand recovery pulses if they can't read SDA to
bail out early. In the worst case, as a write operation. To avoid that
and if we can write SDA, try to send STOP to avoid the
misinterpretation.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -198,7 +198,16 @@ int i2c_generic_scl_recovery(struct i2c_
val = !val;
bri->set_scl(adap, val);
- ndelay(RECOVERY_NDELAY);
+
+ /*
+ * If we can set SDA, we will always create STOP here to ensure
+ * the additional pulses will do no harm. This is achieved by
+ * letting SDA follow SCL half a cycle later.
+ */
+ ndelay(RECOVERY_NDELAY / 2);
+ if (bri->set_sda)
+ bri->set_sda(adap, val);
+ ndelay(RECOVERY_NDELAY / 2);
}
/* check if recovery actually succeeded */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists