linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pfuze100: add optional disable switch-regulators binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180716072516.bvsp54yoeqp3ih6s@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:25:16 +0200
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        fabio.estevam@....com, Anson.Huang@....com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pfuze100: add optional disable
 switch-regulators binding

Hi Mark,

thanks for the review.

On 18-07-13 16:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 02:50:01PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> 
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- fsl,pfuze-support-disable: Boolean, if present disable all unused switch
> > +  regulators to save power consumption. Attention, till 4.18 these regulators
> 
> The property name sounds like it affects all the regulators but really
> it's just the sw ones - how about adding -sw at the end?  Bit of a
> bikeshed but it does end up in an ABI.

You're right, it sounds better. So the new binding will be
fsl,pfuze-support-disable-sw. Are there any other comments about the
implementation?

Regards,
Marco