[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180716073515.307322828@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:36:36 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
"Matt Helsley (VMware)" <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 31/43] x86/mm/pkeys: Fix mismerge of protection keys CPUID bits
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
commit 0d47638f80a02b15869f1fe1fc09e5bf996750fd upstream
Kirill Shutemov pointed this out to me.
The tip tree currently has commit:
dfb4a70f2 [x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions]
whioch added support for two new CPUID bits: X86_FEATURE_PKU and
X86_FEATURE_OSPKE. But, those bits were mis-merged and put in
cpufeature.h instead of cpufeatures.h.
This didn't cause any breakage *except* it keeps the "ospke" and
"pku" bits from showing up in cpuinfo.
Now cpuinfo has the two new flags:
flags : ... pku ospke
BTW, is it really wise to have cpufeature.h and cpufeatures.h?
It seems like they can only cause confusion and mahem with tab
completion.
Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160310221213.06F9DB53@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.helsley@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ----
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -94,10 +94,6 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 : \
x86_this_cpu_test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpu_info.x86_capability))
-/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ecx), word 16 */
-#define X86_FEATURE_PKU (16*32+ 3) /* Protection Keys for Userspace */
-#define X86_FEATURE_OSPKE (16*32+ 4) /* OS Protection Keys Enable */
-
/*
* This macro is for detection of features which need kernel
* infrastructure to be used. It may *not* directly test the CPU
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -276,6 +276,10 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER (15*32+10) /* filtered pause intercept */
#define X86_FEATURE_PFTHRESHOLD (15*32+12) /* pause filter threshold */
+/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ecx), word 16 */
+#define X86_FEATURE_PKU (16*32+ 3) /* Protection Keys for Userspace */
+#define X86_FEATURE_OSPKE (16*32+ 4) /* OS Protection Keys Enable */
+
/*
* BUG word(s)
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists