lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180716073515.536549288@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:36:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
        "Matt Helsley (VMware)" <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
        Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
        Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 33/43] x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Fix broken compile-time disabling of pkeys

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

commit e8df1a95b685af84a81698199ee206e0e66a8b44 upstream

When I added support for the Memory Protection Keys processor
feature, I had to reindent the REQUIRED/DISABLED_MASK macros, and
also consult the later cpufeature words.

I'm not quite sure how I bungled it, but I consulted the wrong
word at the end.  This only affected required or disabled cpu
features in cpufeature words 14, 15 and 16.  So, only Protection
Keys itself was screwed over here.

The result was that if you disabled pkeys in your .config, you
might still see some code show up that should have been compiled
out.  There should be no functional problems, though.

In verifying this patch I also realized that the DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE
macros were defined backwards and that the cpu_has() check in
setup_pku() was not doing the compile-time disabled checks.

So also fix the macro for DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE and add a compile-time
check for pkeys being enabled in setup_pku().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Fixes: dfb4a70f20c5 ("x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513221328.C200930B@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.helsley@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h        |   12 ++++++------
 arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[
 	   (((bit)>>5)==11 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK11)) ||	\
 	   (((bit)>>5)==12 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK12)) ||	\
 	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK13)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK14)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK15)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16)) )
+	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK14)) ||	\
+	   (((bit)>>5)==15 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK15)) ||	\
+	   (((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16)) )
 
 #define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit)					\
 	 ( (((bit)>>5)==0  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK0 )) ||	\
@@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[
 	   (((bit)>>5)==11 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK11)) ||	\
 	   (((bit)>>5)==12 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK12)) ||	\
 	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK13)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK14)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK15)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK16)) )
+	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK14)) ||	\
+	   (((bit)>>5)==15 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK15)) ||	\
+	   (((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK16)) )
 
 #define cpu_has(c, bit)							\
 	(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 :	\
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
-# define DISABLE_PKU		(1<<(X86_FEATURE_PKU))
-# define DISABLE_OSPKE		(1<<(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
-#else
 # define DISABLE_PKU		0
 # define DISABLE_OSPKE		0
+#else
+# define DISABLE_PKU		(1<<(X86_FEATURE_PKU & 31))
+# define DISABLE_OSPKE		(1<<(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE & 31))
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
 
 /*


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ