lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-Id: <20180716073515.872703232@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:36:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
        "Matt Helsley (VMware)" <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
        Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
        Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 36/43] x86/cpufeature: Add helper macro for mask check macros

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

commit 8eda072e9d7c3429a372e3635dc5851f4a42dee1 upstream

Every time we add a word to our cpu features, we need to add
something like this in two places:

	(((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16))

The trick is getting the "16" in this case in both places.  I've
now screwed this up twice, so as pennance, I've come up with
this patch to keep me and other poor souls from doing the same.

I also commented the logic behind the bit manipulation showcased
above.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200110.1BA8949E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.helsley@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganb@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |   90 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -49,48 +49,58 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[
 #define test_cpu_cap(c, bit)						\
 	 test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)((c)->x86_capability))
 
-#define REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit)					\
-	 ( (((bit)>>5)==0  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK0 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==1  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK1 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==2  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK2 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==3  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK3 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==4  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK4 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==5  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK5 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==6  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK6 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==7  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK7 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==8  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK8 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==9  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK9 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==10 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK10)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==11 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK11)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==12 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK12)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK13)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK14)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==15 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK15)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==17 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK17)) ||	\
-	   REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK					   ||	\
+/*
+ * There are 32 bits/features in each mask word.  The high bits
+ * (selected with (bit>>5) give us the word number and the low 5
+ * bits give us the bit/feature number inside the word.
+ * (1UL<<((bit)&31) gives us a mask for the feature_bit so we can
+ * see if it is set in the mask word.
+ */
+#define CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(maskname, word, bit)	\
+	(((bit)>>5)==(word) && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & maskname##word ))
+
+#define REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit)		\
+	 ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  0, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  1, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  2, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  3, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  4, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  5, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  6, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  7, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  8, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK,  9, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK					  ||	\
 	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 18))
 
-#define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit)					\
-	 ( (((bit)>>5)==0  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK0 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==1  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK1 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==2  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK2 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==3  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK3 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==4  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK4 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==5  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK5 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==6  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK6 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==7  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK7 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==8  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK8 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==9  && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK9 )) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==10 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK10)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==11 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK11)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==12 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK12)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==13 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK13)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==14 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK14)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==15 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK15)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK16)) ||	\
-	   (((bit)>>5)==17 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & DISABLED_MASK17)) ||	\
-	   DISABLED_MASK_CHECK					   ||	\
+#define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit)				\
+	 ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  0, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  1, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  2, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  3, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  4, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  5, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  6, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  7, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  8, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  9, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) ||	\
+	   DISABLED_MASK_CHECK					  ||	\
 	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 18))
 
 #define cpu_has(c, bit)							\

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ