linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:59:31 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus,

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:52 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:10 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Commits
> >
> >   bc319333c156 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77965: Add HSCIF pins, groups, and functions")
> >   99500c6a4836 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Revise USB ID pin name")
> >   3d3c62d3458a ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Add USB2.0 pins, groups and functions")
> >   1e0f13198edf ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Add USB3.0 pins, groups and functions")
> >
> > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> I am looking at this and I just feel confused. Top to bottom:

> commit bc319333c156a710891942d34560b9fca0f52f5d
> Author: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@...esas.com>
> Date:   Thu Dec 14 13:04:55 2017 +0900
>
>     pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77965: Add HSCIF pins, groups, and functions
>
>     This patch adds HSCIF{0,1,2,3,4} pins, groups and functions to
>     the R8A77965 SoC.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@...esas.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> This is very confusing, it looks correct to me.
>
> As usual it must be some minor syntactic thing like a character missing or
> something, I am just soo.... what's wrong here, really?

The previous issue was a missing commit from the _author_, not committer.
As you rebased the branch, _you_ are now the committer, not me anymore.
So now your SoBs must be present, too.

As I already told you I had fixed up the author SoB, and updated the tag,
just drop the above commits, pull sh-pfc-for-v4.19-tag1 again, and be done
with it ;-)

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds