[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01812492-b88b-4436-570b-ef776eaafc6a@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:32:20 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
CC: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <prarit@...hat.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 13/18] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
At 07/13/2018 07:30 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 07/12/2018 08:04 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>> During boot tsc is calibrated twice: once in tsc_early_delay_calibrate(),
>>> and the second time in tsc_init().
>>>
>>> Rename tsc_early_delay_calibrate() to tsc_early_init(), and rework it so
>>> the calibration is done only early, and make tsc_init() to use the values
>>> already determined in tsc_early_init().
>>>
>>> Sometimes it is not possible to determine tsc early, as the subsystem that
>>> is required is not yet initialized, in such case try again later in
>>> tsc_init().
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
>>
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> Aha, a complex solution for a simple problem! ;-) And I did find any
>> benefits of doing that. did I miss something?
>
> Hi Dou,
>
> I had this in previous version: init early, and unconditionally
> re-init later (which required to resync sched clocks for continuity,
> and check for some other corner cases). Thomas did not like the idea,
> as it is less deterministic: it leads for code to work by accident,
> where we might get one tsc frequency early and another later, and so
> on. The request was to initialize only once, and if that fails do it
> again later. This way, if early initialization is broken, we will know
> and fix it.
>
Hi Pavel,
Yes, right, I have seen the purpose in v12.
>>
>> As the cpu_khz and tsc_khz are global variables and the tsc_khz may
>> be reset to cpu_khz. How about the following patch.
>
> Could you please explain where you think this patch can be applied,
> and what it fixes?
>
This patch is just an simple alternative to realize what you want in
your patch. your patch is also good but complex, and need some scrub.
eg:
- Is it suitable to using the WARN_ON()
- the name of determine_cpu_tsc_frequncies() function,
s/frequncies/frequencies/. BTW, How about tsc_calibrate_frequencies()
- ...
BTW, before this patch, seems we need make sure xen should work well, I
can investigate and try to test if we can also move the pagetable_init()
to the front of tsc_early_init() for you.
Thanks,
dou
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index da1dbd99cb6e..74cb16d89e25 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1197,12 +1197,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
memblock_find_dma_reserve();
+ x86_init.paging.pagetable_init();
+
tsc_early_delay_calibrate();
if (!early_xdbc_setup_hardware())
early_xdbc_register_console();
- x86_init.paging.pagetable_init();
-
kasan_init();
/*
> Thank you,
> Pavel
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> dou
>> ------------------------8<-----------------------------------
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> index 74392d9d51e0..e54fa1037d45 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> @@ -1370,8 +1370,10 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
>> - tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
>> + if (!tsc_khz) {
>> + cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
>> + tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * Trust non-zero tsc_khz as authorative,
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists