[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180716100101.79272-1-ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:01:01 +0200
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
raspl@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, lifeasageek@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] net/smc: take sock lock in smc_ioctl()
From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@...ux.ibm.com>
SMC ioctl processing requires the sock lock to work properly in
all thinkable scenarios.
Problem has been found with RaceFuzzer and fixes:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in smc_ioctl
Reported-by: Byoungyoung Lee <lifeasageek@...il.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+35b2c5aa76fd398b9fd4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 5334157f5065..a4381b38a521 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1524,6 +1524,7 @@ static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
return -EBADF;
return smc->clcsock->ops->ioctl(smc->clcsock, cmd, arg);
}
+ lock_sock(&smc->sk);
switch (cmd) {
case SIOCINQ: /* same as FIONREAD */
if (smc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN)
@@ -1573,8 +1574,10 @@ static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
}
break;
default:
+ release_sock(&smc->sk);
return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
}
+ release_sock(&smc->sk);
return put_user(answ, (int __user *)arg);
}
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists