[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Owx8SMtenkOwXtqLCk_P8B18CNRkLfyL+GFUW9rYU1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:17:50 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: Reuse SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK buffer
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> The use of SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() will trigger FRAME_WARN warnings
> (when less than 2048) once the VLA is no longer hidden from the check:
>
> net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:398:1: warning: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/rxrpc/rxkad.c:242:1: warning: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> This passes the initial SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK allocation to the leaf
> functions for reuse. Two requests allocated on the stack are not needed
> when only one is used at a time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
This looks like a very nice solution to the problem.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Since the large stack usage could already cause problems in older kernels,
should this be backported to stable kernels as well?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists