[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180716110208.GA25227@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:02:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: mainline/master boot: 177 boots: 2 failed, 174 passed with 1
conflict (v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:54:51AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > On 15/07/18 01:32, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > > mainline/master boot: 177 boots: 2 failed, 174 passed with 1 conflict (v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f)
> > >
> > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/
> > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/
> > >
> > > Tree: mainline
> > > Branch: master
> > > Git Describe: v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f
> > > Git Commit: f353078f028fbfe9acd4b747b4a19c69ef6846cd
> > > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > Tested: 67 unique boards, 25 SoC families, 21 builds out of 199
> > >
> > > Boot Regressions Detected:
> > [...]
> > > x86:
> > >
> > > i386_defconfig:
> > > x86-celeron:
> > > lab-mhart: new failure (last pass: v4.18-rc4-147-g2db39a2f491a)
> > > x86-pentium4:
> > > lab-mhart: new failure (last pass: v4.18-rc4-147-g2db39a2f491a)
> >
> > Please see below an automated bisection report for this
> > regression. Several bisections were run on other x86 platforms
> > with i386_defconfig on a few revisions up to v4.18-rc5, they all
> > reached the same "bad" commit.
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately there isn't much to learn from the kernelci.org
> > boot logs as the kernel seems to crash very early on:
> >
> > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc5/
> > https://storage.kernelci.org/mainline/master/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/x86/i386_defconfig/lab-mhart/lava-x86-celeron.html
> >
> >
> > It looks like stable-rc/linux-4.17.y is also broken with
> > i386_defconfig, which tends to confirm the "bad" commit found by
> > the automated bisection which was applied there as well:
> >
> > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.17.y/kernel/v4.17.6-68-gbc0bd9e05fa1/
>
> Adding Greg directly to the CCs due to the stable impact, not deleting
> context for his benefit.
Hey, I read all stable emails, who else would? :)
> > The automated bisection on kernelci.org is still quite new, so
> > please take the results with a pinch of salt as the "bad" commit
> > found may not be the actual root cause of the boot failure.
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Guillaume
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Bisection result for mainline/master (v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f) on x86-celeron
> >
> > Good: 2db39a2f491a Merge branch 'i2c/for-current' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux
> > Bad: f353078f028f Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
> > Found: e181ae0c5db9 mm: zero unavailable pages before memmap init
> >
> > Checks:
> > revert: PASS
> > verify: PASS
> >
> > Parameters:
> > Tree: mainline
> > URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > Branch: master
> > Target: x86-celeron
> > Lab: lab-mhart
> > Config: i386_defconfig
> > Plan: boot
> >
> > Breaking commit found:
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > commit e181ae0c5db9544de9c53239eb22bc012ce75033
> > Author: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> > Date: Sat Jul 14 09:15:07 2018 -0400
> >
> > mm: zero unavailable pages before memmap init
> > We must zero struct pages for memory that is not backed by physical
> > memory, or kernel does not have access to.
> > Recently, there was a change which zeroed all memmap for all holes in
> > e820. Unfortunately, it introduced a bug that is discussed here:
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg156764.html
> > Linus, also saw this bug on his machine, and confirmed that reverting
> > commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into
> > memblock.reserved") fixes the issue.
> > The problem is that we incorrectly zero some struct pages after they
> > were setup.
> > The fix is to zero unavailable struct pages prior to initializing of
> > struct pages.
> > A more detailed fix should come later that would avoid double zeroing
> > cases: one in __init_single_page(), the other one in
> > zero_resv_unavail().
> > Fixes: 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved")
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 1521100f1e63..5d800d61ddb7 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -6847,6 +6847,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> > /* Initialise every node */
> > mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
> > setup_nr_node_ids();
> > + zero_resv_unavail();
> > for_each_online_node(nid) {
> > pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> > free_area_init_node(nid, NULL,
> > @@ -6857,7 +6858,6 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> > node_set_state(nid, N_MEMORY);
> > check_for_memory(pgdat, nid);
> > }
> > - zero_resv_unavail();
> > }
> > static int __init cmdline_parse_core(char *p, unsigned long *core,
> > @@ -7033,9 +7033,9 @@ void __init set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve)
> > void __init free_area_init(unsigned long *zones_size)
> > {
> > + zero_resv_unavail();
> > free_area_init_node(0, zones_size,
> > __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) >> PAGE_SHIFT, NULL);
> > - zero_resv_unavail();
> > }
> > static int page_alloc_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So this patch breaks i386, ick. I'll wait for the fix to hit Linus's
tree as that's a bit more important to have the large majority of the
x86-64 boxes fixed with this patch for now.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists