[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180716133028.GQ17280@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:30:28 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix vma_is_anonymous() false-positives
On Tue 10-07-18 13:48:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:48:20 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > vma_is_anonymous() relies on ->vm_ops being NULL to detect anonymous
> > VMA. This is unreliable as ->mmap may not set ->vm_ops.
> >
> > False-positive vma_is_anonymous() may lead to crashes:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > This can be fixed by assigning anonymous VMAs own vm_ops and not relying
> > on it being NULL.
> >
> > If ->mmap() failed to set ->vm_ops, mmap_region() will set it to
> > dummy_vm_ops. This way we will have non-NULL ->vm_ops for all VMAs.
>
> Is there a smaller, simpler fix which we can use for backporting
> purposes and save the larger rework for development kernels?
Why cannot we simply keep anon vma with null vm_ops and set dummy_vm_ops
for all users who do not initialize it in their mmap callbacks?
Basically have a sanity check&fixup in call_mmap?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists