[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <384c5426-8589-2931-081b-14382c83962b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 07:28:38 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: luto@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, albcamus@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhong.weidong@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/pti: check the return value of
pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d
On 07/15/2018 09:03 PM, Jiang Biao wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> index 4d418e7..be9e5bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> @@ -195,8 +195,10 @@ static p4d_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(unsigned long address)
> static pmd_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_pmd(unsigned long address)
> {
> gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO);
> - p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);
> pud_t *pud;
> + p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address);
> + if (WARN_ON(!p4d))
> + return NULL;
First of all, I don't think we need the (new) warning here.
pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d() only returns NULL if you try it on a
userspace _address_ or the page allocation fails. It already warns on
the address case.
If you think the allocation path needs a warning, please do it as close
as possible to the _source_ of the warning (the failed allocation), not
in the caller.
This goes for all the variations on this that you have in the set.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists