linux-kernel - Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807161851290.1693@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:56:30 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
cc:     x86@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote:

> At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom family is
> omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit fec9434a12f3
> to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a patch
> adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome?

Probably. Dave?

Thanks,

	tglx