linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.113-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180716180219.GA12046@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:02:19 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.113-stable review

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 07:43:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:41:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:25:38AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:36:08AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.113 release.
> > > > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Jul 18 07:34:43 UTC 2018.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Build results:
> > > > 	total: 148 pass: 133 fail: 15
> > > > Failed builds: 
> > > > 	mips:defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:allnoconfig 
> > > > 	mips:defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:allmodconfig 
> > > > 	mips:allnoconfig 
> > > > 	mips:bcm47xx_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:bcm63xx_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:ath79_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:ar7_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:e55_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:malta_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:rt305x_defconfig 
> > > > 	mips:defconfig 
> > > > Qemu test results:
> > > > 	total: 166 pass: 154 fail: 12
> > > > Failed tests: 
> > > > 	mips:malta_defconfig:nosmp 
> > > > 	mips:malta_defconfig:smp 
> > > > 	mips64:malta_defconfig:nosmp 
> > > > 	mips64:malta_defconfig:smp 
> > > > 	mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:nosmp:initrd 
> > > > 	mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:initrd 
> > > > 	mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:rootfs 
> > > > 	mipsel:mips32r6-generic:malta_32r6_defconfig:smp:rootfs 
> > > > 	mipsel64:malta_defconfig:nosmp:rootfs 
> > > > 	mipsel64:malta_defconfig:smp:initrd 
> > > > 	mipsel64:malta_defconfig:smp:rootfs 
> > > > 	mipsel64:fuloong2e_defconfig:fulong2e:rootfs
> > > > 
> > > > Error is always the same.
> > > > 
> > > > arch/mips/kernel/process.c:637:8:
> > > > 	error: 'call_single_data_t' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > > arch/mips/kernel/process.c: In function 'raise_backtrace':
> > > > /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.9/build/arch/mips/kernel/process.c:648:22:
> > > > 	error: 'csd' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > 
> > > mips should now be fixed with the updated tree I have pushed out.
> > > 
> > 
> > The above is with v4.9.112-33-g7fb1f5e, which is the latest version
> > available from the git repository (as of right now). My builders
> > pulled it at 4:07am this morning, and there was no subsequent update.
> 
> Odd.  Ok, I've bumped the -rc number to -rc2 now, and pushed it all out
> again.  Let me know if you don't see it show up within an hour or so.
> 
Version is now v4.9.112-33-gb44db2b, so something changed, but I still get
the same build error.

Comparing the old and the new version, the only difference is the updated rc.

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 57f315d00a94..986470ef6f6e 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 VERSION = 4
 PATCHLEVEL = 9
 SUBLEVEL = 113
-EXTRAVERSION = -rc1
+EXTRAVERSION = -rc2
 NAME = Roaring Lionus

The error itself is that single_data_t was replaced in the backport with
call_single_data. It should have been "struct call_single_data".

Guenter