[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2386802.jRaeHeNqoJ@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:06:54 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Register when ACPI PCCH is present
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Currently, intel_pstate doesn't load if _PSS is not present on
HP Proliant systems, because it expects the firmware to take over
CPU performance scaling in that case. However, if ACPI PCCH is
present, the firmware expects the kernel to use it for CPU
performance scaling and the pcc-cpufreq driver is loaded for that.
Unfortunately, the firmware interface used by that driver is not
scalable for fundamental reasons, so pcc-cpufreq is way suboptimal
on systems with more than just a few CPUs. In fact, it is better to
avoid using it at all.
For this reason, modify intel_pstate to look for ACPI PCCH if _PSS
is not present and register if it is there. Also prevent the
pcc-cpufreq driver from trying to initialize if intel_pstate has
been registered already.
Fixes: fbbcdc0744da (intel_pstate: skip the driver if ACPI has power mgmt option)
Reported-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530091/
In addition to the intel_pstate changes in the above, it also
prevents pcc-cpufreq from trying to initialize (which will fail
ultimately, but may confuse the firmware in the meantime).
Andreas, please test this one and let me know if it still works for you.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2391,6 +2391,18 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_no_acpi_
return true;
}
+static bool __init intel_pstate_no_acpi_pcch(void)
+{
+ acpi_status status;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+
+ status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", &handle);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return true;
+
+ return !acpi_has_method(handle, "PCCH");
+}
+
static bool __init intel_pstate_has_acpi_ppc(void)
{
int i;
@@ -2450,7 +2462,10 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_platform
switch (plat_info[idx].data) {
case PSS:
- return intel_pstate_no_acpi_pss();
+ if (!intel_pstate_no_acpi_pss())
+ return false;
+
+ return intel_pstate_no_acpi_pcch();
case PPC:
return intel_pstate_has_acpi_ppc() && !force_load;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
@@ -580,6 +580,10 @@ static int __init pcc_cpufreq_init(void)
{
int ret;
+ /* Skip initialization if another cpufreq driver is there. */
+ if (cpufreq_get_current_driver())
+ return 0;
+
if (acpi_disabled)
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists