[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807172141150.1817@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:42:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com, marc.zyngier@....com,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] genirq: Provide basic NMI management for interrupt
lines
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > Supporting desc->affinity_hint for NMIs shouldn't be an issue, right?
>
> Shouldn't NMIs be strictly per cpu interrupt sources?
Right. They are surely not subject to be fiddled with by irqbalanced or
random admin affinity settings.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists